EVERGREEN

Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences and Green Asia Strategy

ISSN:2189-0420 (Print until Mar 2020)
ISSN:2432-5953 (Online)

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Open Access
Scopus
Google Scholar
Crossref
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4.3
2024CiteScore
 
69th percentile
Powered by Scopus
Metrics by SCOPUS 2024
CiteScore
4.3
SJR
0.391
SNIP
1.192


Hybrid ANN–GA and Machine Learning Approaches for Surface Roughness Prediction in CNC Step Turning of Aluminium Alloy

Deepak Kumar1,*, Chandni Kirpalani2
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Swami Keshvanand Institute of Technology, Management & Gramothan, Jaipur 302017, India
2Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Poornima University, Jaipur 303905, India
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed:
E-mail: deepak.kumar@skit.ac.in (DK)
Received: April 20, 2025 | Revised: September 24, 2025 | Accepted: February 17, 2026 | Published: March 2026
Abstract
In this investigation GA (Genetic Algorithms) and ANN (Artificial Neural Networks) was used for predicting surface roughness in CNC-machined aluminium (Al356) components based on machining parameters viz. feed rate (FR), depth of cut (DOC), and cutting velocity (CV) which shows the effectiveness of hybridizing these two computational intelligence techniques. Thus ANN's universal function approximation capability to capture complex relationships between input parameters and surface roughness has been used, while GA was used to optimizes the initial weights and biases of the ANN to prevent convergence to the local minima and enhance global optimization. Hybrid ANN-GA model shows the better performance in comparison with conventional ANN and Nonlinear Regression (NLR) using multiple statistical metrics. The results establish that integrating GA with ANN develops convergence speed and prediction accuracy. The trained hybrid ANN-GA model can efficiently estimate surface roughness, enabling operators to optimize machining parameters for improved efficiency and product quality without extensive experimental runs. For lowest RMSE and MAPE values GA-ANN hybrid model was used. The hybrid ANN-GA model outperformed all approaches, yielding the best prediction accuracy with R² = 0.95, RMSE = 0.0059 µm, and MAPE 1.2%. Furthermore, the hybrid model identified optimized machining parameters—Feed = 0.108 mm/rev, Depth of Cut = 0.266 mm, and Cutting Velocity = 1860.6 m/min—resulting in the lowest predicted surface roughness of 0.0168 µm. These findings highlight the superiority of the ANN-GA hybrid framework for precision machining optimization, providing both predictive accuracy and practical process guidelines. Results from this investigation can aid in enhancing manufacturing efficiency and product-quality in correctness machining of aluminium components.
Keywords
CNC Lathe Machining; Cutting velocity; Depth of Cut; Hybrid ANN – GA; Python; Regression Modelling; Surface Roughness
Available Repositories
Share Article
Article Metrics
--
Views
--
Downloads
--
Citations
Full Text
Download PDF
References
  1. 1) Z. Zhang, F. Jiang, M. Luo, B. Wu, D. Zhang, and K. Tang, "Geometric error measuring, modeling, and compensation for CNC machine tools: A review," Chinese J. Aeronaut., 37 (2), 163-198, (2024) doi:10.1016/j.cja.2023.02.035
  2. 2) P. Mallioris, E. Aivazidou, and D. Bechtsis, "Predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: A systematic multi-sector mapping," CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 50, 80-103, (2024) doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.02.003
  3. 3) A. J. Santhosh, A. D. Tura, I. T. Jiregna, W. F. Gemechu, N. Ashok, and M. Ponnusamy, "Optimization of CNC turning parameters using face centred CCD approach in RSM and ANN-genetic algorithm for AISI 4340 alloy steel," Results Eng., 11, 100251, (2021) doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100251
  4. 4) P. Gupta, B. Singh, and Y. Shrivastava, "Theoretical and Experimental Prediction of Optimal Process Variables for Enhanced Metal Removal Rate During Turning on CNC lathe," Evergreen, 10, (2), 1127-1132, (2023) doi:10.5109/6793673
  5. 5) L. K. Toke, D. M. Mate, L. N. Patil, D. S. Patil, and A. M. Zope, "Optimizing Aluminium Alloy Surface Quality with ANN-Driven Burnishing: Machining Parameters and Durability Study," Evergreen, 11 (2) 927-937, (2024) doi:10.5109/7183375
  6. 6) M. Ntemi, S. Paraschos, A. Karakostas, I. Gialampoukidis, S. Vrochidis, and I. Kompatsiaris, "Infrastructure monitoring and quality diagnosis in CNC machining: A review," CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 38, 631-649, (2022) doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.06.001
  7. 7) E. García-Plaza, P. J. Núñez, D. R. Salgado, I. Cambero, J. M. Herrera Olivenza, and J. García Sanz-Calcedo, "Surface finish monitoring in taper turning CNC using artificial neural network and multiple regression methods," Procedia Eng., 63, 599-607, (2013) doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.245
  8. 8) S. Tangjitsitcharoen, "Comparison of neural networks and regression analysis to predict in-process straightness in CNC turning," Procedia Manuf., 51, 222-227, (2020) doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.032
  9. 9) G. Harinath Gowd, M. Venugopal Goud, K. Divya Theja, and M. Gunasekhar Reddy, "Optimal selection of machining parameters in CNC turning process of EN-31 using intelligent hybrid decision making tools," Procedia Eng., 97, 125-133, (2014) doi:10.1016/j.proeng.(2014).12.233
  10. 10) E. T. Winn-Nuñez, M. Griffin, and L. Crawford, "A simple approach for local and global variable importance in nonlinear regression models," Comput. Stat. Data Anal., vol. 194, December 2023, 107914, (2024) doi:10.1016/j.csda.2023.107914
  11. 11) Kumar V. V., Guleria V., Sunil S., "A novel hybrid RSM–ANN model for surface roughness prediction in turning of Al 6061 alloy," Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 42 (2024) 969-984 doi:10.1142/S0219686724500410
  12. 12) Gopan, V., Wins, K. L. D., & Surendran, A. (2018). Integrated ANN-GA approach for predictive modeling and optimization of grinding parameters with surface roughness as the response. Materials today: proceedings, 5 (5), 12133-12141 doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.191
  13. 13) S. Adil, A. Krishnaiah, and D. S. Rao, "Mathematical modelling and optimization of cutting conditions in turning operation on MDN 350 steel with carbide inserts," J. Alloy. Metall. Syst., 9, 100161, (2025) doi:10.1016/j.jalmes.2025.100161
  14. 14) F. M. H et al., "Optimization and prediction of CBN tool life sustainability during AA1100 CNC turning by response surface methodology," Heliyon, 9 (8), 18807, (2023) doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18807
  15. 15) C. H. Chen, S. Y. Jeng, and C. J. Lin, "Prediction and Analysis of the Surface Roughness in CNC End Milling Using Neural Networks," Appl. Sci., 12 (1), (2022) doi:10.3390/app12010393
  16. 16) S. Hossain, M. Z. Abedin, R. K. Saha, M. Touhiduzzaman, and M. J. Hossen, "Optimization of cutting temperature and surface roughness in CNC turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy using response surface methodology," Heliyon, 11 (1) p. e41051, (2025) doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41051
  17. 17) H. K. Elminir, M. A. El-Brawany, D. A. Ibrahim, H. M. Elattar, and E. A. Ramadan, "An efficient deep learning prognostic model for remaining useful life estimation of high speed CNC milling machine cutters," Results Eng., 24, September, 103420, (2024) doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103420
  18. 18) A. K. Sethi, A. K. Sharma, S. Chandra, and A. Rawat, "The Photovoltaic (PV) Module Performance Analysis using Artificial Neural Network (ANN)," Evergreen, 11 (2), 1273-1278, (2024)
  19. 19) A. Gürgen, A. Çakmak, S. Yıldız, and A. Malkoçoğlu, "Optimization of CNC operating parameters to minimize surface roughness of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) using integrated Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm," Maderas. Ciencia y Tecnología, 24 (1), 1-13 (2022) doi:10.4067/s0718-221X2022000100401
  20. 20) A. Vedrtnam, G. Singh, and A. Kumar, "Optimizing submerged arc welding using response surface methodology, regression analysis, and genetic algorithm," Def. Technol., 14 (3), 204-212, (2018) doi:10.1016/j.dt.2018.01.008
  21. 21) A. Mollaei Ardestani, M. Ghoreishi, A. M. Khorasani, J. P. Davim, and R. Teti, "Application of Machine Learning for Prediction and Process Optimization—Case Study of Blush Defect in Plastic Injection Molding," Appl. Sci., 13(4), 2617 (2023) doi:10.3390/app13042617
  22. 22) Martowibowo, S. Y., & Damanik, B. K. (2021). "Optimization of Material Removal Rate and Surface Roughness of AISI 316L under Dry Turning Process using Genetic Algorithm." Manufacturing Technology, 21 (3), 373-380 doi:10.21062/mft.2021.038
  23. 23) M. Mareš, O. Horejš, and L. Havlík, "Thermal error compensation of a 5-axis machine tool using indigenous temperature sensors and CNC integrated Python code validated with a machined test piece," Precis. Eng., 66, March, 21-30, (2020) doi:10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.06.010
  24. 24) D. Kumar, S. Singh, and S. Angra. "Dry sliding wear and microstructural behavior of stir-cast Al6061-based composite reinforced with cerium oxide and graphene nanoplatelets." Wear 516 (2023), 204615 doi:10.1016/j.wear.2022.204615
  25. 25) D. Kumar, S. Angra, and S. Singh. "High-temperature dry sliding wear behavior of hybrid aluminum composite reinforced with ceria and graphene nanoparticles." Engineering Failure Analysis 151 (2023): 107426 doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107426
  26. 26) D. Kumar, S. Singh and S. Angra. "Synergistic effects of graphene and ceria nanoparticulates on microstructure and mechanical behavior of stir-cast hybrid aluminum composite." Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals 77 (9), (2024): 2699-2709 doi:10.1007/s12666-024-03368-y
  27. 27) L. D. Gemechu, D. A. Efa, and R. Abebe, "Optimizing CNC turning of AISI D3 tool steel using Al₂O₃/graphene nanofluid and machine learning algorithms," Heliyon, 10 (24), p. e40969, (2024), e40969 doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024
  28. 28) M. Soori, B. Arezoo, and R. Dastres, "Machine learning and artificial intelligence in CNC machine tools, A review," Sustain. Manuf. Serv. Econ., vol. 2, no. January, p. 100009, 2023 doi:10.1016/j.smse.(2023).100009
  29. 29) M. A. Ali, N. A. Mufti, M. Sana, M. Tlija, M. U. Farooq, and R. Haber, "Enhancing high-speed EDM performance of hybrid aluminium matrix composite by genetic algorithm integrated neural network optimization," J. Mater. Res. Technol., 31, April, 4113-4127, (2024), doi: 0.1016/j.jmrt.2024.07.077
  30. 30) G. Kant and K. S. Sangwan, "Predictive modelling and optimization of machining parameters to minimize surface roughness using artificial neural network coupled with genetic algorithm," Procedia CIRP, 31, 453-458, (2015) doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.03.043
  31. 31) R. Wang, Y. Du, C. Dai, Y. Deng, J. Leng, and T. Chang, "SGML: A Python library for solution-guided machine learningFigure presented)," Softw. Impacts, 23, 100739, (2025) doi:10.1016/j.simpa.2024.100739
  32. 32) N. Van Thieu, N. H. Nguyen, and A. A. Heidari, "Feature selection using metaheuristics made easy: Open source MAFESE library in Python," Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., 160, no. December 2023, 340-358, (2024) doi:10.1016/j.future.2024.06.006
  33. 33) M. Y. M. Mohsen, A. A. A. Alrashidi, M. A. Alotaibi, A. M. Almutairi, and H. M. Alhajri, "Leveraging machine learning for accurate DNBR prediction using Python," Nucl. Eng. Technol., (2025), 103532 doi:10.1016/j.net.2025.103532
  34. 34) N. D. Dejene and D. W. Wolla, "Comparative analysis of artificial neural network model and analysis of variance for predicting defect formation in plastic injection moulding processes," IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1294, 1, (2023) doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1294/1/012050
  35. 35) I. Saady, A. K. Sharma, M. A. Eltamaly, and A. Al-Sumaiti, "Soft computing approaches for photovoltaic water pumping systems: A review," Clean. Eng. Technol., 22, no. September, 100800, (2024) doi:10.1016/j.clet.2024.100800
  36. 36) R. K. S. Al-Hamd, A. S. Albostami, S. Alzabeebee, and B. Al-Bander, "An optimized prediction of FRP bars in concrete bond strength employing soft computing techniques," J. Build. Eng., 86, February, 108883, (2024) doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108883
  37. 37) N. Kovač, K. Ratković, H. Farahani, and P. Watson, "A practical applications guide to machine learning regression models in psychology with Python," Methods Psychol., 11, (2024) doi:10.1016/j.metip.2024.100156
  38. 38) Z. Nie, W. Gao, H. Jiang, J. Lu, Z. Lu, and X. Jiang, "Predicting critical flame quenching thickness using machine learning approach with ResNet and ANN," J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 92, 105448, (2024) doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105448
  39. 39) M.H. Tsai, J.N. Lee, H.D. Tsai, M.-J. Shie, T.L. Hsu, and H.S. Chen, "Applying a neural network to predict surface roughness and machining accuracy in the milling of SUS304," Electronics, 12 (4), 981 (2023) doi:10.3390/electronics12040981
  40. 40) D. Kumar, S. Angra, and S. Singh. "Mechanical properties and wear behaviour of stir cast aluminum metal matrix composite: a review." Int. J of Engg. 34 (2022), doi.org/10.5829/ije.2022.35.04A.19
Other Papers in This Issue