EVERGREEN

Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences and Green Asia Strategy

ISSN:2189-0420 (Print until Mar 2020)
ISSN:2432-5953 (Online)

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Open Access
Scopus
Google Scholar
Crossref
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4.3
2024CiteScore
 
69th percentile
Powered by Scopus
Metrics by SCOPUS 2024
CiteScore
4.3
SJR
0.391
SNIP
1.192

Navigating the Dual Transition: AI Energy Consumption, Energy-efficient AI Practices, and Green Business Performance in Emerging Economies

Nguyen Van Dat1, Canh Chi Hoang1,*
1Faculty of Business Administration, Ho Chi Minh University of Banking, 36 Ton That Dam Street, Sai Gon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed:
E-mail: hoangcc@hub.edu.vn (CCH)
Evergreen, Vol. 13, Iss. 02, pp. 657–672, 2026
DOI: 10.5109/7429613
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Received: March 06, 2026 | Revised: March 25, 2026 | Accepted: April 19, 2026 | Published: June 2026
Abstract
The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) across global industries has intensified the debate surrounding digital transformation and environmental sustainability. This study develops and tests a moderated mediation framework examining how AI energy consumption influences green business performance, with energy-efficient AI practices as a mediating mechanism and organizational sustainability commitment as a dual moderator. Drawing on survey data from 385 managers and IT professionals across diverse industries—an emerging economy undergoing rapid digital and green transitions—and employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), we find that AI energy consumption exerts a significant negative direct effect on green business performance. This negative effect is substantially attenuated through energy-efficient AI practices, which partially mediates the relationship. Critically, sustainability commitment operates as a dual moderator: it amplifies the transformation of AI energy consumption challenges into energy-efficient AI practices, and simultaneously enhances the effectiveness of energy-efficient AI practices in generating environmental performance gains. These findings extend established sustainable technology management theory to emerging economy contexts and offer novel insights into the complementary rather than competitive relationship between digital advancement and environmental stewardship. Practical implications for managers and policymakers seeking to align AI deployment with national sustainability objectives are discussed.
Keywords
artificial intelligence; energy consumption; energy efficiency; green business performance; sustainability commitment
Available Repositories
Journal DOI Zenodo Archive
Share Article
Article Metrics
--
Views
--
Downloads
--
Citations
Export Citation
BibTeX RIS Semantic Scholar CrossRef Mendeley Google Scholar
Full Text
Download PDF
References
  1. 1) Y. Zhou and W. Bu, "From Artificial Intelligence to Energy Reduction: How Green Innovation Channels Corporate Sustainability". Systems, 13(9) 757 (2025) doi:10.3390/systems13090757
  2. 2) D. Rolnick et al., "Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning". ACM Computing Surveys, 55(2) 1-96 (2022) doi:10.1145/3485128
  3. 3) Q. Zhao, L. Wang, S.-E. Stan, and N. Mirza, "Can artificial intelligence help accelerate the transition to renewable energy?". Energy Economics, 134 107584 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107584
  4. 4) "IEA Study Sees AI, Cryptocurrency Doubling Data Center Energy Consumption by 2026," International Energy Agency.https://www.datacenterfrontier.com/energy/article/33038469/iea-study-sees-ai-cryptocurrency-doubling-data-center-energy-consumption-by-2026 (accessed Last Update Date)
  5. 5) E. Strubell, A. Ganesh, and A. McCallum, "Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP". Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. Type retrieved from (Year) doi:10.18653/v1/P19-1355
  6. 6) D. Van Hoang, N. Thi Hien, H. Van Thang, P. Nguyen Truc Phuong, and T. Thi-Thuy Duong, "Digital Capabilities and Sustainable Competitive Advantages: The Case of Emerging Market Manufacturing SMEs". Sage Open, 15(2) 21582440251329967 (2025) doi:10.1177/21582440251329967
  7. 7) S. Bianchini, G. Damioli, and C. Ghisetti, "The environmental effects of the "twin" green and digital transition in European regions". Environ Resour Econ (Dordr), 84(4) 877-918 (2023) doi:10.1007/s10640-022-00741-7
  8. 8) J. Liu, L. Liu, Y. Qian, and S. Song, "The effect of artificial intelligence on carbon intensity: Evidence from China's industrial sector". Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 83 101002 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.seps.2020.101002
  9. 9) J. Zhong, Y. Zhong, M. Han, T. Yang, and Q. Zhang, "The impact of AI on carbon emissions: evidence from 66 countries". Applied Economics, 56(25) 2975-2989 (2023) doi:10.1080/00036846.2023.2203461
  10. 10) S. Falk, A. van Wynsberghe, and L. Biber-Freudenberger, "The attribution problem of a seemingly intangible industry". Environmental Challenges, 16 101003 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.envc.2024.101003
  11. 11) A. S. Luccioni, E. Strubell, and K. Crawford, "From efficiency gains to rebound effects: The problem of jevons' paradox in AI's polarized environmental debate". Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2025 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. Type retrieved from (Year) doi:10.1145/3715275.3732007
  12. 12) M.-K. Kim, T.-A. Yoo, and J.-B. Chung, "Toward Sustainable AI: A Scoping Review of Carbon Footprint and Environmental Impacts Across Training and Inference Stages". IEEE Access, 14 18881-18896 (2026) doi:10.1109/access.2026.3659894
  13. 13) M. Farghali et al., "Strategies to save energy in the context of the energy crisis: a review". Environ Chem Lett, 21(4) 1-37 (2023) doi:10.1007/s10311-023-01591-5
  14. 14) B. Wang, J. Wang, K. Dong, and R. Nepal, "How does artificial intelligence affect high-quality energy development? Achieving a clean energy transition society". Energy Policy, 186 114010 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114010
  15. 15) M. Song, H. Pan, Z. Shen, and K. Tamayo-Verleene, "Assessing the influence of artificial intelligence on the energy efficiency for sustainable ecological products value". Energy Economics, 131 107392 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107392
  16. 16) D. Balsalobre-Lorente and S. A. R. Shah, "Stay circular economy, empowerment, and natural resource utilization factual factors for SDG 12? The principal role of digital technologies". J Environ Manage, 370 122459 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122459
  17. 17) M. L. Arco-Castro, M. V. López-Pérez, A. Macías-Guillén, and L. Rodríguez-Ariza, "The role of socially responsible investors in environmental performance. An analysis of proactive and reactive practices". Journal of Cleaner Production, 419 138279 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138279
  18. 18) E. Genç and C. A. D. Benedetto, "A comparison of proactive and reactive environmental strategies in green product innovation". International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 13(3/4) 431-451 (2019) doi:10.1504/ijisd.2019.100377
  19. 19) A.-N. El-Kassar and S. K. Singh, "Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices". Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144 483-498 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016
  20. 20) S. Mischos, E. Dalagdi, and D. Vrakas, "Intelligent energy management systems: a review". Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(10) 11635-11674 (2023) doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10441-3
  21. 21) A. Tabbakh, L. Al Amin, M. Islam, G. M. I. Mahmud, I. K. Chowdhury, and M. S. H. Mukta, "Towards sustainable AI: a comprehensive framework for Green AI". Discover Sustainability, 5(1) 408 (2024) doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00641-4
  22. 22) D. M. Marchiori, R. G. Rodrigues, E. W. Mainardes, and S. Popadiuk, "The role of IT capabilities, IT reconfiguration capability and innovativeness on organizational performance: evidence from the Brazilian public sector". Revista de Administração Pública, 57(2) e2022-0221 (2023) doi:10.1590/0034-761220220221x
  23. 23) A. S. Shaik, S. M. Alshibani, G. Jain, B. Gupta, and A. Mehrotra, "Artificial intelligence (AI)‐driven strategic business model innovations in small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises. Insights on technological and strategic enablers for carbon neutral businesses". Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4) 2731-2751 (2023) doi:10.1002/bse.3617
  24. 24) A. C. Benabdellah, K. Zekhnini, A. Cherrafi, J. A. Garza‐Reyes, and A. Kumar, "Design for the environment: An ontology‐based knowledge management model for green product development". Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8) 4037-4053 (2021) doi:10.1002/bse.2855
  25. 25) D. Glavas, "Balancing AI’s energy consumption with commitments to clean energy (SDG 7): Is there a trade-off?". International Journal of Green Energy, 23(1) 194-206 (2025) doi:10.1080/15435075.2025.2546047
  26. 26) A. Luqman, Q. Zhang, S. Talwar, M. Bhatia, and A. Dhir, "Artificial intelligence and corporate carbon neutrality: A qualitative exploration". Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5) 3986-4003 (2024) doi:10.1002/bse.3689
  27. 27) M. Rajhi and H. Y. Aljuhmani, "Fostering Sustainable Innovation Through Communication Quality: The Sequential Role of Trust in Leadership and Organizational Commitment in Team-Based Enterprises". Sustainability, 18(2) 554 (2026) doi:10.3390/su18020554
  28. 28) R. A. Al-Husain et al., "Optimizing sustainability performance through digital dynamic capabilities, green knowledge management, and green technology innovation". Sci Rep, 15(1) 24217 (2025) doi:10.1038/s41598-025-04912-6
  29. 29) A. V. Tran and B. T. Khoa, "Integrating leadership, identity, and knowledge systems for sustainable performance in the era of digital transformation". Discover Sustainability, 6(1) (2025) doi:10.1007/s43621-025-01842-1
  30. 30) J. Guirguis, A. Abdulmaksoud, M. Ismail, P. J. Kollmeyer, and R. Ahmed, "Transformer-Based Deep Learning Strategies for Lithium-Ion Batteries SOX Estimation Using Regular and Inverted Embedding". IEEE Access, 12 167108-167119 (2024) doi:10.1109/access.2024.3495560
  31. 31) J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. "Multivariate data analysis". Hampshire, United Kingdom: Cengage Learning, 2019
  32. 32) R. W. Brislin. "The wording and translation of research instruments". Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc, 1986
  33. 33) P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, "Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies". J Appl Psychol, 88(5) 879-903 (2003) doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  34. 34) J. S. Armstrong and T. S. Overton, "Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys". Journal of marketing research, 14(3) 396-402 (1977)
  35. 35) R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations". J Pers Soc Psychol, 51(6) 1173-82 (1986) doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
  36. 36) A. F. Hayes. "Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach". New York, NY, US: Guilford Press, 2013
  37. 37) H. W. Marsh, Z. Wen, and K. T. Hau, "Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction". Psychol Methods, 9(3) 275-300 (2004) doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275
  38. 38) J. F. Hair Jr, G. T. M. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R". Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2021 doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  39. 39) R. B. Kline. "Principles and practice of structural equation modeling". New York: Guilford publications, 2015
  40. 40) B. T. Khoa, T. Khanh, D. B. X. Cuong, and L. D. N. Thanh, "Altruistic Antecedents and Green Purchase Intentions: Understanding Generation Z’s Sustainable Consumption Behaviors". Paper presented at the, Singapore, 1 537-551 (2026) doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4017-4_34
  41. 41) J. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. "A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)". Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2022
  42. 42) N. Kock, "Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM". International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4) 1-10 (2015) doi:10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  43. 43) X. Qin and L. Wang, "Causal moderated mediation analysis: Methods and software". Behav Res Methods, 56(3) 1314-1334 (2024) doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02095-4
  44. 44) D. Filiou, E. Kesidou, and L. Wu, "Are smart cities green? The role of environmental and digital policies for Eco-innovation in China". World Development, 165 106212 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106212
  45. 45) A. V. Tran and B. T. Khoa, "The Consumer Decision Journey of Gen Z in Cross-Platform Commerce: From Social Commerce Stimuli to E-Marketplace Purchase Completion". Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 21(5) 132 (2026) doi:10.3390/jtaer21050132
Other Papers in This Issue