EVERGREEN

Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences and Green Asia Strategy

ISSN:2189-0420 (Print until Mar 2020)
ISSN:2432-5953 (Online)

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Open Access
Scopus
Google Scholar
Crossref
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4.3
2024CiteScore
 
69th percentile
Powered by Scopus
Metrics by SCOPUS 2024
CiteScore
4.3
SJR
0.391
SNIP
1.192


Material Waste Analysis Using Lean Construction In the Project of Gedung Hunian Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Narkotika

Sapitri1,*, Atika Oktaviani1, Muhammad Noor Hisyam Jusoh2
1Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru, 28284, Indonesia
2Faculty of Engineering, Technology and Built Environment, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed:
E-mail: spitriap@eng.uir.ac.id (S)
Received: September 28, 2025 | Revised: February 19, 2026 | Accepted: May 31, 2026 | Published: June 2026
Abstract
Material waste poses cost in the construction project management process. This research aims to determine the quantity of high-cost material waste and pinpoint the primary causes of waste in the Gedung Hunian Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Narkotika construction project. Employing a lean construction approach, data were analyzing using the IBM SPSS 26 application. Material waste levels were calculated by comparing the waste volume and the total installed material, while the Borda method was utilized to rank the most influential waste indicators. The results analysis identified three high-cost materials: threaded rebar, K-300 ready-mix concrete, and plain rebar. Specifically, the percentage of material waste level for threaded rebar were 1% (D19), 11% (D16), 3% (D13), 5% (D10); K-300 ready mix concrete was 3%; and for plain rebar were 5% (Ø12), 1% (Ø10), and 0% (Ø8). Overproduction variable, characterized by an indicator of overuse of materials that exceed the needs, emerged as the main causative waste factor, weighing 0.45. These findings provide actionable insights for minimizing material waste and improving cost efficiency in construction projects.
Keywords
borda; lean construction; material waste; waste level; waste ranking
Available Repositories
Share Article
Article Metrics
--
Views
--
Downloads
--
Citations
Full Text
Download PDF
References
  1. 1) B. Witjaksana, and S.P. Reresi, “Project cost analysis using the earned value method in performance process (case study on the Widya Mandala Pakuwon Citi-Surabaya Catholic University development project),” Jurnal Teknik Sipil Untag Surabaya, 11 (02) 45–56 (2012).
  2. 2) R.S. Sanusi, Sulistyoweni, and B. Trigunarsyah, “The Problem of Waste/Unnecessary Costs in Construction Implementation in Indonesia," in: Commemoration of 25 Years of MRK Education in Indonesia, Institut Teknologi Bandung, 1–9 (2014).
  3. 3) M. Solichin, “Analysis of Differential Power of Questions, Level of Difficulty, Validity of Test Items, Interpretation of Test Results and Validity of Predictions in Educational Evaluation,” Dirasat: Jurnal Manajemen & Pendidikan Islam, (2) 192–213 (2017). www.depdiknas.go.id/evaluasi-proses-.
  4. 4) M. Adi Widyatmika, and N.B. Bolia, “Unveiling segregation and composting behavior in urban communities: a case study of Sarbagita municipality, Indonesia,” Evergreen Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy, 11 (02) 612–623 (2024).
  5. 5) A. Zhumadilova, and S. Zhigitova, “Features of modern areas of solid waste disposal,” Evergreen Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy, 10 (02) 640–648 (2023).
  6. 6) S.B.M. Akbar, and O.L. Sari, “Waste Analysis Using Lean Construction Approach in The Manggar River Bridge Project in Balikpapan,” Info Teknik, (1) (2022).
  7. 7) S. Intan, R.S. Alifen, and L. Arijanto, “Analysis and Evaluation of Construction Material Waste: Sources, Quantities and Costs,” Civil Engineering Dimension, 7 (1) 36–45 (2005). http://puslit.petra.ac.id/journals/civil.
  8. 8) Y. Hanafiah, “Analysis of Waste Material in Wall Plastering Work,” Yogyakarta, 2019.
  9. 9) N.E.M. and M.L. Pattiapon, “Implementation of Lean Construction on PT. Pesona Graha Mandiri Ambon to Reduce Non-Added Value Activity,” National Seminar “Archipelago Engineering” (ALE), (2018).
  10. 10) W.I. Budi, “Identification of Factors Causing Construction Delay Analysed Using Lean Construction Concept (Case Study of The Mall X Construction Project),” Depok, 2010.
  11. 11) C. Igwe, A. Hammad, and F. Nasiri, “Influence of lean construction wastes on the transformation-flow-value process of construction,” International Journal of Construction Management, 22 (13) 2598–2604 (2022). doi:10.1080/15623599.2020.1812153.
  12. 12) A. Husen, “Project Management,” Yogyakarta, 2011.
  13. 13) M. G. Tamallo and A. Nursin, “Evaluation of Non-Physical Waste Using Lean Construction in Sanggala Construction Project,” PROKONS: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 12–18 (2020).
  14. 14) S. Ap and F. Firdaus, “Construction Waste: Identification of its Potentials and Causes in Housing Project in Pekanbaru,” Jurnal Saintis, 19 (02) 79 (2019). doi:10.25299/saintis.2019.vol19(02).3904.
  15. 15) M.I.S. Othman, R. Zainal, N. Kasim, and M.H.I.A. Rahim, “Project Management Practices to Empower Lean Construction in Malaysia’s Construction Industry,” Research in Management of Technology and Business, 4 (1) 961–978 (2023). doi:10.30880/rmtb.2023.04.01.068.
  16. 16) A.J. Gultom, and A. Sutandi, “Ranking and Factors causing of Material Waste in X Project in Serpong,” JMTS: Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil, 6 (2) 223–236 (2023).
  17. 17) M.M. Sanaky, L.M. Saleh, and H.D. Titaley, “Analysis of the factors causing delays in the construction project of the MAN 1 Tulehu dormitory building, Central Maluku,” Jurnal Simetrik, 11 (1) 432–439 (2021).
  18. 18) D. Harpriani Dewi and Sapitri, “Study of waste time and implementation of value stream mapping for sloof and column work,” Jurnal Saintis, 24 (01) 49–60 (2024).
  19. 19) M.A. Marhani, N.A.S.M. Othman, and N.A.A. Ismail, “Issues and impact of lean construction implementation in the Malaysian construction industry,” International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12 (3 special issue) 258–268 (2021). doi:10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.03.025.
  20. 20) B. Sayed, K. Venkatesh, and S.S. Asadi, “Evaluation of reducing waste materials in construction projects using ranking analysis,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 9 (3) 831–838 (2018).
  21. 21) A. Pradana, and I.N.D.P. Putra, “Waste level and cost analysis of steel reinforcement work in construction projects,” Jurnal Ilmu Teknik, 1 (4) 156–162 (2024). doi:10.62017/tektonik.
  22. 22) John Bicheno, “The Lean Toolbox: The Essential Guide to Lean Transformation,” 6th ed., PICSIE Books, Buckingham, Inggris Raya, 2020.
  23. 23) D.G. Saari, “Selecting a voting method: the case for the borda count,” Constitutional Political Economy, 34 (3) 357–366 (2023). doi:10.1007/s10602-022-09380-y.
  24. 24) L.J. Koskela, and J.A. Rooke, “Which are the wastes of construction?,” in: Proceedings IGLC, Fortaleza, Brazil, 3–12 (2013). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290543537.
  25. 25) Suripto, and A.R. Susanti, “Waste evaluation and implementation of lean construction for the campus X building project,” Jurnal Rivet (Riset Dan Invensi Teknologi), 1 (2) 65–72 (2021).
  26. 26) R. Atkinson, and J. Flint, “Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies,” United Kingdom, 2001.
  27. 27) N. Nurdiani, “Snowball sampling technique in field research,” ComTech, 5 (2) 1110–1118 (2014).
  28. 28) J.T. Chan, “Snowball Sampling and Sample Selection In A Social Network,” in: The Economic of Networks - Advances in Econometrics, Emerald Group Holdings Ltd, 61–80 (2020). doi:10.1108/S0731-905320200000042008.
  29. 29) L.E.C. Rocha, A.E. Thorson, R. Lambiotte, and F. Liljeros, “Respondent-driven sampling bias induced by community structure and response rates in social networks,” J R Stat Soc Ser a Stat Soc, 180 (1) 99–118 (2017). doi:10.1111/rssa.12180.
  30. 30) H.K. Mohajan, “Two criteria for good measurements in research: validity and reliability,” Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 17 (4) 59–82 (2017). doi:10.26458/1746.
  31. 31) T.J. Sitinjak, and Sugiarto, “Lisrel,” first, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2006.
  32. 32) M. Ulum, “Validity and Reliability Test,” First, Malang, 2016.
  33. 33) Sugiono, “Statistics for Research,” CV Alfabeta, Bandung, 2007.
  34. 34) Alan. Agresti, and Barbara. Finlay, “Statistical Methods for The Social Sciences,” 4th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.
  35. 35) H. Sujakhu, and W. Jutidamrongphan, “Generation of construction waste in hydroelectric power station in nepal,” EVERGREEN Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy, 11 1613–1624 (2024).
  36. 36) P.O. Lestari, S.A.K.A. Uda, and W. Nuswantoro, “Identification of waste material handling based on the views of contractors and consultants in Palangkaraya,” Serambi Engineering, VII (3) (2022).
  37. 37) N.K.S.E. Yuni, N.P.I. Yuliana, and I.K. Sudiarta, “Analysis of rebars waste material in an effort to control construction material waste,” Jurnal Teknik Sipil Terapan, 5 (1) 22–29 (2023). http://jurnal.polimdo.ac.id/.
  38. 38) A. Inge, and A.P. Waghmare, “Advances in construction: lean construction for productivity enhancement and waste minimization,” International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS), 2 (11) (2015).
  39. 39) S. Agus Bambang, M.A. Salim, and A. Prastiawati, “Evaluation of construction material waste: case study of The Faculty of Syariah Building IAIN Pekalongan Construction Project,” 2022.
  40. 40) R.R. Faruki, and H. Wiyanto, “Analysis of material waste and causal factors in X apartment project,” JMTS: Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil, 6 (4) 863–872 (2023).
  41. 41) H. Sulistio and M. Wati, “Analysis of factors of rebars material waste loss from reinforced concrete in multi-storey building,” Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran Dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 5 (1) 235 (2021). doi:10.24912/jmstkik.v5i1.10120.
  42. 42) M.S. Bajjou, and A. Chafi, “The potential effectiveness of lean construction principles in reducing construction process waste: an input-output model,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, 12 (4) 4141–4160 (2018). doi:10.15282/jmes.12.4.2018.12.0358.
  43. 43) I.G.N.E. Pratama, I.G.M. Sudika, and E.L.B. Saputra, “Analysis of rebar scraps using Cutting Optimization Pro software in building construction,” Jurnal Teknik Gradien, 15 (02) 30–38 (2023). http://www.ojs.unr.ac.id/index.php/teknikgradien.
  44. 44) B.A. Rinengga, A. Trisiana, and W.Y. Widiarti, “Calculation of waste materials in the Ngudi Waluyo Hospital Intensive Care Unit (ICU) construction project in Blitar,” Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil Dan Lingkungan, 8 (1) 15–25 (2024).
  45. 45) Sapitri, F.A. Aziz Azizi, A. Yulianti, D.P. Retno, Elizar, and B. Susanti, “Application of BIM Technology in Construction Industry for Modeling, Quantity Takeoff, and Scheduling Simulation,” in: 2025 7th International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking, SmartNets 2025, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Istanbul, 2025. doi:10.1109/SmartNets65254.2025.11106790.
  46. 46) U. Bharadwaj, and A. Singh, “Sustainable green construction practices using Griha parameters and BIM tools implementation on building design,” Evergreen Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy, 11 (03) 1641–1654 (2024).
  47. 47) D. Singh, and A. Singh, “Role of building automation technology in creating a smart and sustainable built environment,” Evergreen Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy, 01 (10) 412–420 (2023).
  48. 48) S. Hosny, A.H. Ibrahim, and Y. Nabil, “Reducing reinforced concrete materials waste in construction projects using building information modeling in Egypt,” Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 28 332–345 (2023). doi:10.36680/j.itcon.2023.017.
  49. 49) R.F. Prasetyo, R.A. Darmawan, and D.T. Setiamanah, “Evaluation of rebar waste rate calculation model utilizing building information modelling function: high rise building case study,” APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship, 5 (2) 128–135 (2023). doi:10.34306/att.v5i2.298.
Other Papers in This Issue